Enhancing technology leaders’ instructional leadership through a project-based learning online course

Abstract

This study detailed the course design principles and implementation of project-based learning (PBL) in a technology-themed graduate-level online course. Students were trained to develop knowledge and skills in instructional leadership, such as the capability to design, deliver, and evaluate educational technology professional development programs. Pre- and post-survey data were collected to examine any change in students' knowledge and skills in instructional leadership by completing this course (N = 18). Quantitative findings revealed positive learning outcomes, and there was statistical significance regarding student improvement in knowledge and skills of instructional leadership, rendering the PBL approach viable.

Citation: Min Lun Wu, Lan Li, Yuchun Zhou. Enhancing technology leaders' instructional leadership through a project-based learning online course[J]. STEM Education, 2023, 3(2): 89-102. doi: 10.3934/steme.2023007

Related Papers:

[1] Tasadduq Imam . Good practices of delivery and teaching leadership for online educators in technical disciplines: A perspective. STEM Education, 2021, 1(2): 92-103. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021007
[2] Heiko Dietrich, Tanya Evans . Traditional lectures versus active learning – A false dichotomy?. STEM Education, 2022, 2(4): 275-292. doi: 10.3934/steme.2022017
[3] Soheila Garshasbi, Brian Yecies, Jun Shen . Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system. STEM Education, 2021, 1(4): 225-255. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021016
[4] Yujuan Li, Robert N. Hibbard, Peter L. A. Sercombe, Amanda L. Kelk, Cheng-Yuan Xu . Inspiring and engaging high school students with science and technology education in regional Australia. STEM Education, 2021, 1(2): 114-126. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021009
[5] William Guo . Design and implementation of multi-purpose quizzes to improve mathematics learning for transitional engineering students. STEM Education, 2022, 2(3): 245-261. doi: 10.3934/steme.2022015
[6] Mingfeng Wang, Ruijun Liu, Chunsong Zhang, Zhao Tang . Daran robot, a reconfigurable, powerful, and affordable robotic platform for STEM education. STEM Education, 2021, 1(4): 299-308. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021019
[7] Ruiheng Cai, Feng-kuang Chiang . A laser-cutting-centered STEM course for improving engineering problem-solving skills of high school students in China. STEM Education, 2021, 1(3): 199-224. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021015
[8] Eduard Krylov, Sergey Devyaterikov . Developing students' cognitive skills in MMS classes. STEM Education, 2023, 3(1): 28-42. doi: 10.3934/steme.2023003
[9] Tang Wee Teo, Aik Ling Tan, Yann Shiou Ong, Ban Heng Choy . Centricities of STEM curriculum frameworks: Variations of the S-T-E-M Quartet. STEM Education, 2021, 1(3): 141-156. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021011
[10] Lotfi Romdhane, Mohammad A. Jaradat . Interactive MATLAB based project learning in a robotics course: Challenges and achievements. STEM Education, 2021, 1(1): 32-46. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021003
Last updated on 10/26/2023